Home » Tuck Talk » Chapter by Chapter » Tuck's nest
Tuck's nest [message #4300] Thu, 08 December 2005 22:39 Go to next message
Erin Halfelven  is currently offline Erin Halfelven
Messages: 712
Registered: September 2002
Location: Surf City, USA
Senior Member
Administrator
I haven't seen anyone else mention this, so I'll bring it up: what does everyone think about Tuck being back in Tuckcentral with all the Tucknology to do things like get in touch with Travis?
Re: Tuck's nest [message #4301] Fri, 09 December 2005 06:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Sir Lee  is currently offline Sir Lee
Messages: 440
Registered: October 2003
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Senior Member
"Tucknology..." I like that Very Happy

Well, I guess he COULD get in touch with Travis... if he could talk more than a few seconds at a time. Mike probably wouldn't put much of a fuss.

The thing is, there was some indication of "trouble in paradise" right before Tuck was attacked -- meaning that Val has a LOT to talk with Travis. Preferrably in person. And right now she isn't phisically able to do that.

So, Travis will have to wait until Tuck stops pupating.

Pupating... hmmm, just ocurred to me... I wonder if that particular simile had an intended second meaning? "Pupa" is another, more generic name for a chrysalis... Is Tuck undergoing his "final metamorphosis" so to speak, and will he emerge as a full-time Val?

Sir Lee


Don't call me Shirley. You will surely make me surly.
Re: Tuck's nest [message #4306] Sat, 10 December 2005 02:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ellen Hayes  is currently offline Ellen Hayes
Messages: 684
Registered: September 2002
Senior Member
Does anyone really WANT to see Tuck spinning a coccoon?
His parents don't.
His brother (Brian) would attempt to put him out with the garbage.


Ellen
nosig
Re: Tuck's nest [message #4314] Sun, 11 December 2005 08:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Leesya  is currently offline Leesya
Messages: 9
Registered: October 2003
Location: Inside the Beltway
Junior Member
Ellen Hayes wrote on Sat, 10 December 2005 02:02

Does anyone really WANT to see Tuck spinning a coccoon?
His parents don't.
His brother (Brian) would attempt to put him out with the garbage.


Ellen
nosig



Okay,I can't resist. I think that Tuck spinning a coccon, without having a triluminary, would be a boneheaded thing to do.

Rolling Eyes

Leesya
Re: Tuck's nest [message #4317] Mon, 12 December 2005 12:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mthead  is currently offline mthead
Messages: 28
Registered: May 2005
Location: Baton Rouge
Junior Member
I, too, took notice of the word pupating - root: pupa[Latin, girl, doll.]- and thought it a strange choice. Are we to assume that Tuck is in a non-feeding stage of metamorphosis? If so, when he emerges will it be to the imago?

I think Ellen could not resist the word and knew it would elicit this response.
Re: Tuck's nest [message #7344] Mon, 24 September 2012 14:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stanman  is currently offline stanman
Messages: 292
Registered: May 2008
Senior Member
Actually, considering the unique nature of Tuck/Val, that could also mean a choice to be Tuck, Val, or even BOTH.
Re: Tuck's nest [message #7348] Tue, 25 September 2012 22:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anne  is currently offline Anne
Messages: 355
Registered: April 2012
Senior Member
The fact that Tuck is trying to live both as Tuck and Val is what caused him to have these problems. Oh not entirely. I mean the jocks could have left him alone. He wasn't approaching them (though his appearance was bothering them 'cause they would see him and mistake him for a female...) as a female nor was he trying to date any cheerleaders...

Anyway I half expect that Ellen will have the mass in Val's abdomen start to grow and then metastasize thereby killing Val in the next 6 months... Twisted Evil

However I guess what I'm saying is that Tu/Val needs to be sat down by his counselor and to really look at hir life. After all transitioning to Val is not undoable. Tuck has said that in essence he feels more socially accepted as Val so why not? Except for hir insistence on continuing to attend McAllen as Tuck there really is no barrier to hir transition to Val full time.
Re: Tuck's nest [message #7352] Mon, 01 October 2012 15:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stanman  is currently offline stanman
Messages: 292
Registered: May 2008
Senior Member
If Tuck chooses to be Val, will she have an operation, or keep the option of becoming Tuck by wearing a compression vest?
Re: Tuck's nest [message #7358] Fri, 05 October 2012 11:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anne  is currently offline Anne
Messages: 355
Registered: April 2012
Senior Member
Tuck (or Val) hates going to the doctor. Therefore I cannot see herm willingly submitting hermself to surgery. Therefore if herm decides to continue the dual life of presenting as both male and female at various times herm will have to do something about the protuberances on herms chest.

However as I noted above herms main problem may well not be just the development of tits but rather a feminized face. Herm mother told herm that the difference is not so great. When herm meets strangers now they are apt to identify herm as female irregardless of how herm is attempting to present. This is true even when herm is wearing body armor which is generally very effective in hiding breasts.

Also Tuck has complained about herms development of a feminine posterior which is much more difficult to hide than herms breasts. This is like herm face. A piece of data that added together with the buttocks says 'woman'.

[Updated on: Fri, 05 October 2012 11:04]

Re: Tuck's nest [message #7361] Sat, 06 October 2012 01:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stanman  is currently offline stanman
Messages: 292
Registered: May 2008
Senior Member
Are there not appliances made to hide either male or female attributes?
Re: Tuck's nest [message #7365] Tue, 16 October 2012 11:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Brooke  is currently offline Brooke
Messages: 695
Registered: August 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Senior Member
stanman wrote on Fri, 05 October 2012 22:38

Are there not appliances made to hide either male or female attributes?


To hide breasts, you use binders. Which even for Tuck's modest attributes, is at best uncomfortable. Also, not possible until Tuck's ribs heal.

And long term use of binders tends to damage the breast tissue. So that's out unless Tuck is planning on a mastectomy in the future.

Re: Tuck's nest [message #7366] Wed, 17 October 2012 21:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anne  is currently offline Anne
Messages: 355
Registered: April 2012
Senior Member
I'm going t take a WAG and say that a gaff is uncomfortable to wear and possibly damaging as well. Someone who is TG M to F and has experience with one can correct me if I'm wrong.
icon7.gif  Re: Tuck's nest [message #7373] Tue, 23 October 2012 06:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stanman  is currently offline stanman
Messages: 292
Registered: May 2008
Senior Member
thank you
Re: Tuck's nest [message #7381] Sun, 28 October 2012 12:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Brooke  is currently offline Brooke
Messages: 695
Registered: August 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Senior Member
Anne wrote on Wed, 17 October 2012 18:17

I'm going t take a WAG and say that a gaff is uncomfortable to wear and possibly damaging as well. Someone who is TG M to F and has experience with one can correct me if I'm wrong.


Well, I've not used one personally (and due to a hydrocele, probably couldn't use one now) but it's my understanding that it's not very uncomfortable unless you get an erection.

There's some discomfort for a moment when you push the testicles up inside (I used to do that, but didn't have a gaff and couldn't get tape to stay stuck)

Only two real issues. One, the higher temp inside the body will render the guy sterile after a few hours. But once the testicles are released and allowed to return to their normal temp, fertility will recover. (This, btw, is *why* the testicles are outside the body)

The other issue is that the spermatic cords could get twisted or pinched. This would be *extremely* painful. And since it'd be cutting off blood flow to the affected testicle it'd have to be corrected quickly or he'd lose it.

Look up "testicular torsion" for a similar condition.

Anyway, this should be pretty rare using a gaffe or other tricks like tape assisted tucking.

Oh yeah, unlikely, but a concern is that if you do this in a way that prevents erections and keep things that way for a long time (weeks/months) there will be shrinkage of the penis.

This often happens to MtFs on hormones. It also happens with some medical conditions such as untreated sleep apnea. Which is how I know about it.

Size/length can be restored with frequent "exercise" of the penis (anything that induces a firm erection). But it can take a *long* time to get it back.

Re: Tuck's nest [message #7392] Thu, 15 November 2012 05:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stanman  is currently offline stanman
Messages: 292
Registered: May 2008
Senior Member
As I understand it, Tuck has no testicles. How would that affect his wearing a gaff?
Re: Tuck's nest [message #7402] Sat, 17 November 2012 10:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anne  is currently offline Anne
Messages: 355
Registered: April 2012
Senior Member
It is probably more comfortable than duct tape!
Re: Tuck's nest [message #7403] Sat, 17 November 2012 18:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Brooke  is currently offline Brooke
Messages: 695
Registered: August 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Senior Member
stanman wrote on Thu, 15 November 2012 02:12

As I understand it, Tuck has no testicles. How would that affect his wearing a gaff?


Almost render the gaff unnecessary. But it'd definitely be more comfortable. At least as long as nothing caused an erection. Smile
Re: Tuck's nest [message #7406] Tue, 20 November 2012 06:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stanman  is currently offline stanman
Messages: 292
Registered: May 2008
Senior Member
maybe a flesh colored panty that simulates a vagina then. there are such appliances available Tuck and company are savvy enuff to make one, too. In one aunt jane story, a student wore a leotard type costume and passed as a girl. i am sure that that battle ax can help tuck, there.
Re: Tuck's nest [message #7414] Fri, 30 November 2012 12:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anne  is currently offline Anne
Messages: 355
Registered: April 2012
Senior Member
A gaff simulates a vulva. I know that porn (as I read and write it) tends to confuse and conflate the vulva and vagina. The vulva is the outer visible lips and what is called the slit. A gaff or similar appliance in a flesh tone could simulate a vulva but not a vagina.

For Tuck all he needs is a thick pair of panties and to tuck his appendage. He has nothing else that would give him away. Now when this all fails is if he has a medical exam. But for all practical purposes Tuck is developing the body of a girl with a dangler. Hiding that so long as he doesn't get sexually excited is no problem at all.

Remember the scene in the main saga at the slumber party at Tuck's house? He put on a tight (maybe a size too small) pair of panties and another right size pair and looked mostly like the other girls? He doesn't (as I've noted) always see his face. But he is damned sure aware of his body. This is evident even at the beginning of the saga in that he is watching his weight and complaining that his booty is getting big.

The fact of his hormonal balance being 'female' is the reason for this. However, it also affects his face. And I'd guess his hands and possibly even his hair. Though the last is more a grooming issue. Thus if he wears an androgynous hair cut even with his breasts well concealed he will be identified by strangers as a 'girl'.

[Updated on: Fri, 30 November 2012 12:16]

Re: Tuck's nest [message #7467] Fri, 22 February 2013 19:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ellen Hayes  is currently offline Ellen Hayes
Messages: 684
Registered: September 2002
Senior Member
Anne wrote on Wed, 26 September 2012 03:31


Anyway I half expect that Ellen will have the mass in Val's abdomen start to grow and then metastasize thereby killing Val in the next 6 months... Twisted Evil

Maybe it'll turn into a bud... and then there'll be two of them.

Which, if both of THEM have buds... leads to a very large problem in the middle-distant future. Or it leads to the end society in "Forever War". Sort of.
Re: Tuck's nest [message #7526] Sun, 10 March 2013 17:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anne  is currently offline Anne
Messages: 355
Registered: April 2012
Senior Member
Nah, If TuVal buds like this in a few years they will rule the world. No war necessary they will control all our computers!
Re: Tuck's nest [message #7665] Mon, 18 March 2013 03:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stanman  is currently offline stanman
Messages: 292
Registered: May 2008
Senior Member
Are you saying that Tuck/Val is a Borg?
Re: Tuck's nest [message #7693] Tue, 19 March 2013 17:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ellen Hayes  is currently offline Ellen Hayes
Messages: 684
Registered: September 2002
Senior Member
stanman wrote on Mon, 18 March 2013 07:00

Are you saying that Tuck/Val is a Borg?

Not yet. But, hoo boy, if the opportunity was there...
"I am Rootkit of Borg. And somebody's about to get their semimetallic ass assimilated."


Ellen
Re: Tuck's nest [message #7703] Wed, 20 March 2013 19:12 Go to previous message
stanman  is currently offline stanman
Messages: 292
Registered: May 2008
Senior Member
Just wondering what you have in store for Tuck/Val.
Previous Topic:Valentine Special
Next Topic:Post-Valentine #3 up!
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Sep 18 12:15:13 EDT 2018

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02489 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 2.7.7.
Copyright ©2001-2007 FUD Forum Bulletin Board Software